The Universe Inside

I was up before first light, first ensuring that the hallmark above my mind was secure, and it was. Deeply etched was the word, Faith, standing sentinal above my mind hole. Faith in myself and, if I stay three-treasures fit, complete faith in the Way. Realizing first as I concentrated on my diaphram, that one can absorb the sutras, like speed reading. Samadal, sutral, mindful concentration, feet first, then floating slowly upward through my bones, muscles, gelatanous pipes and cables. Anatomical identification scores the rising scan of my body. I realized that my sentience was the mudroom into the house of craving. I, too, understood that the wonder of my body coalesced, not into the hard and soft hardware and software within, but into point where there is singularity, like your God Almighty. The point at which I'm free to extrapolate the magic of my joint and several body outward into the dark holes of space, absorbing the sutras and dharma abstractly and curved light without reading a word. But, you can't cheat at this, so there's much to be done. I'm reminded that I still have time to do it, but barely enough.

Michael Brecker Quartet🔝🔝 Terrassa Jazz Festival 1999 Part 1

There's no chickenshit nonsense bullshit on my fone, goddammit!

Look deeper into this sentence and you will find that the message, frivoloous as it may be, evinces a dancing cadence when read, especialy aloud. Much like a sentence that I wrote embedded within a piece of prose, long forgotten, about the school cafeteria and lunch boxes, wherein I put, "Mom made for trading fruit for boiled eggs at table two."

Voir Dire (VD), Opening Statements (OS), and Closing Arguments (CA) -- Boilerplates

Ladies and Gentlemen: He law is a righteous endeavor. It takes square aim at righteousness. And that righteusness is delivered by you people. One one hand, you're faced with imprisoning an innocent man, effectively ruining his life. ON the other, you're faced with letting a guilty person go free, leaving justice, perhaps, up to the hand of God at a later date. Of these two, option one is the best course of action if you have any doubt about my client's guilt. A unjust conviction will follow you home, reappear in your dreams, and haunt you for the balance of your life.
The State will/has waste[d] your time by providing you with weak indicia of proposed evidence; the way he looked, the way she acted, acted guilty:  BULLSHIT.

IMPORTANT TIP:  As I'm preparing for trial, open a word document and fill it with ideas, strategy, cross x questions, themes, good OS, VD, and CA ideas.  Go into the document constantly, making changes, organizing, editing, etc. until my trial strategy.

Relay the Jury instructions constantly.  "Judge Pearson will tell you that you shall ...

The Sherry Gilliam case is a good example of me putting this to use.  I got Sherry acquitted without even calling her to testify.  My case was made on cross examination of States witnesses.  I put on no proof of my own aside from telling the jury that Kohl's Department Store was a Menomenie Wisconson "behemoth" that generated 19 billion dollars in revenue in 2018 alone.


CA:  What can I say?  Well, I can easily say this  . . .

How did things come to be this way.

VD/OS/CA:  The most effective forces that drive people to act are fear and intimidation.  Fear and intimidation have historically been employed to build pyramids, to construct the Great Wall of China, and even the Washington Monument.  And in every case that intimidation was handed down from governments. Intimidation is still employed in order to exact the truth from witnesses at trial.  Take this courtroom, for example.  It's not only guarded to armed sentinels, it calls for respect.  FED ONLY:  Cavernous.

He did not "act."  He "reacted."

Reasonable Doubt:  When you deliberate the fate of Mr. X ask yourselves this question:  If I find him guilty will there be any lingering, residual doubt in my mind as I live out the rest of my life that I may have irreversibly convicted an innocent person of a crime he did not commit.  Make sure you don't put yourself in this position if at all possible.  Err on the side of acquittal if such doubt exists because you won't have a second chance.

You hold perhaps more power today than you'll hold for the rest of your lives.  You have the power to convict if you find that every element of the crime has been proven beyond a reasonable doubt, and you have the power to acquit in the event you find that these elements have not been proven beyond a reasonable doubt, undergirded with moral certainty.  I want to disuss the latter of these for a moment.
I heard most recently tht jurors minds are made up after opening statements. I don't believe it. Opening statements are not evidence. JUst words, like the finger pointing at the moon, which eclipses the the very thing at which it points.
The moon is always full.  These halves and crescents we celebrate are only illusions.

You'll have to live with your decision.  So make it count, and err on the side of liberty.

"Neighbors."

I trust that your deliberations will be based on sound reasoning and your verdict empowered with moral certainty.  Anything short of that is unjust.

Jury wins:  Jeff Sexton, Jason Singleton, Danny Burton, Johnny Trent, Billy McMahan, Benton Greene, Wesley Crockett, Sherry Gilliam, (DUI case Amvets), sheldon johnson, sheldon johnson, danny dyer, John Cowan, Boyd Mayes, Beverly Black,

Organic Law

Organic law. An organic law is a law, or system of laws, that form the foundation of a government, corporation or any other organization's body of rules. A constitution is a particular form of organic law for a sovereign state. May 19 2019

Iced Nandina